Sunday, December 05, 2004

The Militant Imam of Northern Ireland

In the late 1950's, the labour movement amongst the poor of Northern Ireland was spreading. Like many trends from America, 'organized labour' had taken a while to reach the shores of the Eire's Rock. Hot on the heels of this godless phenom, were the ideals of equality and civil rights. If the influence of democratic socialism reached Northern Ireland, workers would focus on organizing in greater numbers against their employers, and for religious leaders on both sides of the North's great divide, that meant Protestants and Catholics joining together to put aside ancient grievances and start working productively. They may even turn away from that all encompassing and domineering mother that had a vice grip on their lives-the church. It was a pivotal crossroads for the Northern Irish: they could put down their weapons and realize their common enemies that kept them divided, or they could trod down the beaten path of armalites, direct rule, sedition, sectarian violence and barbed wire.

Sensing an opportunity to counteract the sea change, Reverand Ian Paisley stepped into the void and struck a new course for the Protestants of Northern Ireland. As the Guardian recently reported:

Dr Paisley began in politics in 1959 by forming the Ulster protestant association to prevent Belfast's dockworkers from being seduced by Gerry Fitt's Marxism.
Countering the socialist cause with appeals to loyalty to the country, God and King, Paisley started his march against the social changes that had overwhelmed the west. The church, while bringing in tourists and their dollars to France and all over Europe, had taken a beating by Camus, Satre and the war in general: How could God exist if he allowed World War 2? Paisley and the North, were insulated from this sentiment in some ways. The Irish had in fact been shamefully sympathetic to the Germans because of their shared animosity for the English, and had stayed neutral during the war. Other than bringing some conscripts to the action, the Irish had blissfully missed most of the action and fallout. As a result, they also missed out on the soul searching and introspection that most of Europe went through. For the Northern religious leaders, they could breathe a sigh of relief: If they could stem the tide of secularization from the continent, they could surely repel the civil rights movement and social change from the United States.

Paisley, sensing a momentum, found a guiding light and a pride in taking on this menace. Concentrating on proselytizing the most vulnerable group, at risk of falling to socialism: the working poor. In Northern Ireland today, the most militant areas on both sides of the religious divide are from the most dilapidated neighbourhoods. Like fundamentalist leaders in other countries fighting a similar battle, Paisley immunized the poor from the spreading liberalization by appealing to their mortality, their ignorance, their baser instincts, their god and their pride. If nothing else, they could be proud of their Protestantism. Why would they join up with Catholic workers? They worship a devil, and show reverance for the Pope. Or, as Paiseley put it, "I denounce you, Anti-Christ!" he screamed at the Pope during a session of the European Parliament during the Pope's address.

Paisley not only gave religious justification for violence against Catholics, he incited it. During the height of the civil war movement in Northern Ireland, an event (a precursor to the Bloody Sunday Massacre) involving Paisley came to pass. In 1968, in a Sharpton-esque speech that incited clear and present danger, Paisley convinced 500 Protestants to attack and loot Catholic homes. He justified his actions, explaining that:

"Catholic homes caught fire because they were loaded with petrol bombs; Catholic churches were attacked and burned because they were arsenals and priests handed out sub-machine guns to parishioners; and the massive discrimination in employment and shortage of houses for Catholics were simply because they breed like "rabbits" and multiply like "vermin".
Not coincidentally, memberships in the Catholic Irish Republican Army spiked during this period. Similarly, the loyalist Ulster Defense Association began its own operations, cashing in on the fear of Catholic equality and the fire and brimstone speeches from the pulpit by Paisley. In five year period in the early seventies, the UDA murdered 600 Catholics in cold blood. Freddie Parkinson, a leader of the UDA in later years, stated that Paisley was:

"a tarantula who spreads the venom of further conflict and has been a major contributor to our prolonged tragedy."

The inference here is that Catholics were only one of many victims of his hatred. The Protestant community itself was a major victim of this 'venom', to be sure. Reverand Paisley was a respected religious and secular leader who had taken advantage of a people's god fearing vulnerability and abused their trust to no end. Like any abusive relationship, the abuser suffers just as the abused does. Already at odds with a violent past and colonial misdeeds, the Protestant community already carries considerable baggage. They are ridden with guilt, debased by their actions, have suffered by Catholic retaliation, and driven by self-loathing.

Like religious leaders in all areas of the globe, Paisley has abused the fear of the afterlife to conquer his mortal enemies. The poor of Northern Ireland were divided and conquered on his watch and with his blessing. Like Cardinal Law, like priests and bishops of the residential schools, like Richelieu, like the Spanish Inquisition, like the Salem Witch trials, and not unlike several other historically tragic movements, Paisley is the latest incarnation of the charismatic leader who identifies an enemy to attack and to divert attention away from real problems. He offered bread and circuses, misdirection, and a cure-all for the Protestant Northern Ireland: Kill the Catholic leaders, invade their country and convert them. There is an earthly salvation for your present torment, and an outlet for your rage: use your frustration to acheive a noble religious goal. God will forgive your actions if they are in his service.

His message is eerily similar to the one found in the dark recesses of the Muslim world. A religious leader whispering into the ear of the poor and vulnerable: if they will only do his dirty work, they can be saved.

Certainly, Reverant Paisley is not the only responsible figure in Northern Ireland. As a wise man once said "Throw a rock in the air, you'll hit someone guilty." But certainly, his continued presence and influence is disturbing. This is the man that holds the talks for peace in his hands, with his large voting bloc of the loyalist DUP party in his grasp.

The silver lining has been that there has been an uneasy peace in the North for years, and with this peace Paisley's ability to incite violence grows weak. A generation may go by that never knew sectarian violence in the North, never knew an uncle that was killed by the British Government or an IRA henchman, and never knew the mob violence that destroyed their homes. The memories of these deeds will fade as long as the violence stays dorment. History, sectarian violence and lynch mobs may disappear from living memory, and a fresh chance to throw down the cross that all the Irish bare will present itself. It is at that moment of opportunity, they may have a sober look at the true cause of their painful shared experience.

For now, amongst the crumbling tenements and walls of West Belfast's poor, a brand new structure rises, soaring ten stories above the ghetto, boasting a glorious steeple that dominates the blood red sky. The houses below, are small and trembling before an ever present and watchful alter: their crutch, their father, their justification, their love, their guide, their hope, their lifeline, their drug and their curse.

5 Comments:

At 11:33 PM, Blogger Shamrocks! said...

Ian-Whoa, I was not trying to give a history of Ireland, nor would I bother trying! If I did, I would still be writing that post! I don't disagree with anything you stated, or believe anything fundamentally different than yourself. I'll be the first guy to tell you the PIRA, RIRA/IRA etc are not the good guys and I'll be the first to tell you that they have done bad, bad things-No argument there.

The only purpose of this post was to point out that I believe Paisley is militant fundamentalist who has abused his position within secular politics and as a religious leader. I won't pretend that the Catholics or the Sinn Fein or morally superior, although I will admit I sympathize with them ....and I do sympathize to a large extent with the Protestant community as well. They have been abused to no end by manipulative leaders like Paisley, and it takes a renegade! like Trimble to try and pull everyone to the table to negotiate-something Paisley has avoided at all costs. Whatever you think of him, it takes balls for him to tell the unionists you are going to the table with Adams.

I think that Paisley, on the balance, has been and continues to be a hateful individual and I think it is unfortunate that loyalists continue to value his leadership. If they feel he is a great leader, that's fine, I just think differently. Like I have stated before, I have spent time in both the republic and the north, but apparently not as much time as you have. I'm not sure how much time I have to spend there before my opinion reaches par value.

As for Catholics voting and loving (!) Paisley, well, I have heard things of that nature before. It doesn't suprise me: some westerners vote Liberal in Canada. We don't know what compels them: it might be masochism, might be derangement, but they can vote for whomever they like.

Why don't you write a piece defending Paisley? I'd love to hear a defense.

 
At 5:46 PM, Blogger Shamrocks! said...

Ian:
I'm aware of Northern Irish history, and I know how the republic came into being. Do I have to post a reading list before I get any respect, or what?

I can't speak for the republic, but I would say joining the commonwealth is probably, in my view, the last thing the south will do. Personally, if I were in the republic, I'd feel the same as well. Why would you show your former oppressor any respect? I'm glad the Irish opted out of the commonwealth as a final '**** you!' to the crown. And why not? Why would you show kindness to the guy who tried to drown you? Repeatedly. Would you bow to their king? Their crown? I think the chances of the US opting into the commonwealth are better.

Anyways, I discussed your conversation with the older Catholic women to a friend. They replied with "Yeah, I bet they 'like' Paisley, because they know what might happen if they don't". Cynical? Maybe. But if I were a beaten minority under Paisley's thumb, I'm sure I might start getting some Stockholm Syndrome as well.

Any small actions Paisley may have taken to help a constituent (he is a politician, after all) does not nullify the enourmous evil he has spread. He is the Arafat of the North, and hope he fades from view as fast as possible.

 
At 10:56 AM, Blogger Shamrocks! said...

Ian:
Okay, I should probably consider what I write with more, uh, scrutiny. I'm not trying to come off as hostile, but that's kind of what it looks like I suppose. My bad.

I used to work for the legal department of the Office of Residential Schools, so I could tell you stories about the Catholic church.....and the gov, and the other churches too: it would make your head spin. I am in no way defending anything the Catholic church does. At all.

I suppose I could have noted that yes, Paisley did not operate in vacuum. The Catholics were up to no good at certain points for sure. There are two sides to every story, etc, but that doesn't mean I have to represent Paisley's side. Should I mention that the IRA was operating? Or that the Irish are backwards in some ways?

I could have I suppose. But this post wasn't a news column-certainly there are jackasses on both sides, and I don't dispute anything you have said. Bigotry, etc, exists on both sides, no doubt. Just because I'm attacking Paisley, doesn't mean I'm defending every mishap of the Catholic church. Hell, the church I was referring to in the final paragraph was the new catholic church in West Belfast.

I'm not saying history began at a certain point, either, but I can't give an entire history of Ireland because I'm writing a piece about how I think it is disappointing that Paisley is still in power. That is the only point I'm trying to make.

It is too bad he used religion to kill civil rights, equality, and reinforce bigotry-in short, he used religion to kill all the positive things about socialism (and hey, there are only a few). Ireland missed out on a historic opporutunity, and Paisley was a big part of the problem. He made things worse. I could easily write something on a half dozen catholic leaders who did similar things, but most of them aren't in the same position. The other thing, is that the sinn fein and the Catholics have been trying to come to the peace table to try and put this garbage behind them (for the most part) but Paisley especially has been a big holdout.

He has sidelined the agreements, called the anglo-irish and good friday agreements garbage, and refused to even speak to Gerry Adams-and that's funny, because for all the bad shit Adams did (he once opened fire in a crowded prot pub), he isn't nearly as bad as Paisley and at least Adams was open to discussion.

Anyways, my view is that i'm picking on the biggest shithead in Northern Ireland. But I will certainly agree that history isn't irrelevant, and I will try to put things in context in the future.

 
At 2:36 AM, Blogger Chris said...

Actually it turns out Patrick that Paisley is willing to talk to Adams, albiet in only a religious and not political context.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Northern_Ireland/Story/0,2763,1372411,00.html

Although this is something of a technicality, perhaps it is a minor thaw in relations.

 
At 9:07 AM, Blogger Shamrocks! said...

I stand corrected, but if you read that article..Paisley wants Adams to be in submission "admit to me that you are a sinner"....That's not encouraging.

It is funny though, because confessing to a priest your sins is Catholic rite..not a protestant one. ----and I realize Paisley is a reverand, but you know what I mean.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home